General


You have GOT to check out this Theological Toolbar!  Most things in life aren’t free, but this is.  And it is worth $$$!  There are quite a lot of things that really are too good to be true, but this is not one of them.  This is good and true.  Check it out:

Theological Toolbar

I highly recommend this Theological toolbar if use the interent even only once in awhile.  I use it everyday. 
This is a true case of Theology being made accessible by technology.  Download this very user-friendly and spiritually helpful tool for free today!

A friend of mine sent me an email asking me about the recent video entitled, “DIDJESUSGIVEUSTHENAMEOFTHEANTICHRIST.wmv”.  You can watch it on YouTube.  Here is my response to him.
 
I’m not sure if it is meant as a joke or not.  I don’t know who made it.  Everyone who knows me well knows that I am no fan of our president.  I disagree with him probably on almost every major Theological, Moral, and Political issue.  However, this video is among the worst Biblical exegesis out there. 
 
First of all, when interpreting Scripture, we are should not be seeking to read between the lines, but rather the very lines themselves.  We should not look for some hidden code in numbers or transliterated letters, but rather for what the words themselves actually mean. 
 
Secondly, we must seek to understand the words in their given context (not ours here in 21st America) and how they were actually intended by the writers (under God) of the Bible.  Thus, if we can manipulate the words and letters and patterns in the Bible (or in Shakespeare’s plays or the NY Times) to make it say something like this, it does not mean that that is what the original writers intended for their orginal readers to understand. 
 
Thirdly, the passages that this video points to have very clear meanings referring to satan’s past fall from heaven, not the Anti-Christ’s future take over. Let’s be honoring to Jesus and His Word by taking Him at His word, as He intended them.
 
Fourthly, while there may be one final Anti-Christ to come in the future, there have been and still are and will be many anti-Christ’s (I John 2:18; II John 7).  Whoever is not with Him, is against Him.
 
Fifthly, in order to understand Scripture we should be taking Hebrew, Aramaic, or Greek words and translating them, NOT transliterating them.  The difference is this: Translating is taking a word from the original language and writing it in another language with the intended meaning of that word in it’s given context.  Transliterating is taking the letters of a word from the original language and writing the letters in another language.  For instance, the Greek word “γη” in English is translated as “earth”, but it is transliterated as “ge“, pronounced as “gay” in English.  This, of course, does not mean that the physical earth we have is happy or homosexual.  That is just plain stupid. 
 
Sixthly, some words in the Bible are proper names as well as common nouns, verbs, adjectives, etc….  The name, “Timothy”, means “honoring God”, but people called him Timothy.  If we were to read a Scripture passage about how we our commanded to always be honoring God, we would not suppose the passage to be saying that we must become “Timothy” or change our name to Timothy.  So we need to understand that names are names, and verbs are verbs and nouns are nouns and so forth.  And there is actually a man in the Bible named “Barak” (See Judges 4 and 5 and Hebrews 11:32).  And yes, his name does mean, “lightning”, but he in no way is likened to satan, the anti-Christ, or our current president.  Why is that?  Because that does not fit someone’s twisted agenda.
 
I hope all of this is clear.  There is just such a lack of serious Bible study and honest handling of God’s Word.  If people wanted to do it badly enough, they could twist the Bible to make it say that “Bob Hope” or “Oprah Winfrey” is the anti-Christ.  I would hate for someone to be incited by such a video to devise a plan to attack our president.  And I would hate it even more if such a video incited an attack on our president with the Word of God and the Name of Christ being dragged through the proverbial mud as this was claimed to be a “Christian” thing.

Every Christian is commanded to share the Gospel with others (Matthew 13:51-52; 28:16-20; Mark 16:15-16; Luke 24:45-49; John 20:21).

Most Christians know this and have at least some desire and commitment to do this, however we also have many obstalces that distract us from our mission.

One of satan’s biggest and best weapons which he uses to distract us from our mission of evangelizing the world is busyness and preoccupation with our own lives. 

When we experience the countless little ”necessities” of life, the innumerable entertainments screaming out for our constant attention, the good and important activities and events (including church services and programs and service projects), and especially the big and painful situations in our personal and family lives (such as job losses, physical ailments, money problems, relationship difficulties, or other inconvenient and uncomfortable circumstances), we too often veiw them as obstacles that overwhelm and sidetrack us.

This renders us useless, at best.

Yet if we look at how the Apostle Paul handled his own personally painful situations in such passages as Philippians 1:12-ff, I believe that we will be convicted and encouraged.

Philippians 1:12 –

I want you to know, brothers, that what has happened to me [his completely unjust imprisonment for sharing the Gospel] has actually served to advance the gospel

Do you see this?  If you read the rest of the context (vv. 13-18 specifically) you will see that Paul viewed his negative circumstances not as an obstacle to fulfilling his God-given mission, but rather as another opportunity that the Sovereign Lord has given to him for the advancement of the Gospel.

How do you view your circumstances?  Do you see only or mostly obstacles?

May we pray that the Lord would help us to see the opportunities for Gospel-advancement in every situation (good or bad) that He brings our way.  And may we give thanks in everything, asking Him to bless us by working through us for the spread of the Good News unto the growth of His Kingdom and the glory of His Name!

header4-resized-image-960x198Here is an EXCELLENT website with extremely practical help in leading your family in the worship of our worthy Triune God everyday! Please check it out!

This has been on my heart lately, so when I read the following post (and the two links on “part 1 and part 2″), I just had to post it here. 

(The following is a highjacked post from JT.)

Matt Harmon offers ten theses (part 1, part 2) on the kingdom of God and social justice, and explains what he means by each.  Go to the posts to see each thesis briefly unpacked. Here are the theses:

  1. We must learn from church history.
  2. We must allow biblical and theological convictions to shape our engagement in social action.
  3. We must not collapse the already/not-yet tension.
  4. We must recognize that evangelical engagement with these issues will take different forms within different political, cultural and social contexts.
  5. We must prioritize proclamation of the gospel without neglecting social action.
  6. We must realize that our actions are not self-interpreting.
  7. We must recognize the trend towards increasing social action and decreasing evangelism within the church.
  8. We must think through and articulate the connection between specific social action and the gospel.
  9. We must not allow people’s physical needs to blind us or them to their even greater spiritual needs.
  10. We must recognize the challenges that come with working with others of different beliefs.

Here are three summary points that I’d like to add:

1. “The Gospel plus deeds of love adorns the Gospel.
Deeds of love without the Gospel adorn us.”  (I believe this was said by DJP.)
2. In order to guard ourselves against falling into the social-gospel movement, we must love the Gospel more than the fundamentalists and we must love the community more than the emergents… we must be more committed to and passionate about doctrine than the “conversatives” and we must be more committed to and passionate about engaging and connecting to people than the “liberals”.

3. We will be entirely ineffective if we are either different and uninvolved OR involved and yet not different.  For if we are the former, we will have something to say, but no one to say it to, and if we are the latter, then we will have an audience, but no message of weight or power.  We must have something to say AND someone to say it to.

Next Page »