Life and Living


A friend of mine sent me an email asking me about the recent video entitled, “DIDJESUSGIVEUSTHENAMEOFTHEANTICHRIST.wmv”.  You can watch it on YouTube.  Here is my response to him.
 
I’m not sure if it is meant as a joke or not.  I don’t know who made it.  Everyone who knows me well knows that I am no fan of our president.  I disagree with him probably on almost every major Theological, Moral, and Political issue.  However, this video is among the worst Biblical exegesis out there. 
 
First of all, when interpreting Scripture, we are should not be seeking to read between the lines, but rather the very lines themselves.  We should not look for some hidden code in numbers or transliterated letters, but rather for what the words themselves actually mean. 
 
Secondly, we must seek to understand the words in their given context (not ours here in 21st America) and how they were actually intended by the writers (under God) of the Bible.  Thus, if we can manipulate the words and letters and patterns in the Bible (or in Shakespeare’s plays or the NY Times) to make it say something like this, it does not mean that that is what the original writers intended for their orginal readers to understand. 
 
Thirdly, the passages that this video points to have very clear meanings referring to satan’s past fall from heaven, not the Anti-Christ’s future take over. Let’s be honoring to Jesus and His Word by taking Him at His word, as He intended them.
 
Fourthly, while there may be one final Anti-Christ to come in the future, there have been and still are and will be many anti-Christ’s (I John 2:18; II John 7).  Whoever is not with Him, is against Him.
 
Fifthly, in order to understand Scripture we should be taking Hebrew, Aramaic, or Greek words and translating them, NOT transliterating them.  The difference is this: Translating is taking a word from the original language and writing it in another language with the intended meaning of that word in it’s given context.  Transliterating is taking the letters of a word from the original language and writing the letters in another language.  For instance, the Greek word “γη” in English is translated as “earth”, but it is transliterated as “ge“, pronounced as “gay” in English.  This, of course, does not mean that the physical earth we have is happy or homosexual.  That is just plain stupid. 
 
Sixthly, some words in the Bible are proper names as well as common nouns, verbs, adjectives, etc….  The name, “Timothy”, means “honoring God”, but people called him Timothy.  If we were to read a Scripture passage about how we our commanded to always be honoring God, we would not suppose the passage to be saying that we must become “Timothy” or change our name to Timothy.  So we need to understand that names are names, and verbs are verbs and nouns are nouns and so forth.  And there is actually a man in the Bible named “Barak” (See Judges 4 and 5 and Hebrews 11:32).  And yes, his name does mean, “lightning”, but he in no way is likened to satan, the anti-Christ, or our current president.  Why is that?  Because that does not fit someone’s twisted agenda.
 
I hope all of this is clear.  There is just such a lack of serious Bible study and honest handling of God’s Word.  If people wanted to do it badly enough, they could twist the Bible to make it say that “Bob Hope” or “Oprah Winfrey” is the anti-Christ.  I would hate for someone to be incited by such a video to devise a plan to attack our president.  And I would hate it even more if such a video incited an attack on our president with the Word of God and the Name of Christ being dragged through the proverbial mud as this was claimed to be a “Christian” thing.

I rejoice that I am not in control,

but that, by virtue of being in union with the Gracious Savior,

I am under the care of Him who is

too wise to err,

too kind to injure,

too tender to crush,

and too sovereign to fail.

(This is an adapted paraphrase of a puritan prayer from The Valley of Vision, pg. 43).

Every Christian is commanded to share the Gospel with others (Matthew 13:51-52; 28:16-20; Mark 16:15-16; Luke 24:45-49; John 20:21).

Most Christians know this and have at least some desire and commitment to do this, however we also have many obstalces that distract us from our mission.

One of satan’s biggest and best weapons which he uses to distract us from our mission of evangelizing the world is busyness and preoccupation with our own lives. 

When we experience the countless little ”necessities” of life, the innumerable entertainments screaming out for our constant attention, the good and important activities and events (including church services and programs and service projects), and especially the big and painful situations in our personal and family lives (such as job losses, physical ailments, money problems, relationship difficulties, or other inconvenient and uncomfortable circumstances), we too often veiw them as obstacles that overwhelm and sidetrack us.

This renders us useless, at best.

Yet if we look at how the Apostle Paul handled his own personally painful situations in such passages as Philippians 1:12-ff, I believe that we will be convicted and encouraged.

Philippians 1:12 –

I want you to know, brothers, that what has happened to me [his completely unjust imprisonment for sharing the Gospel] has actually served to advance the gospel

Do you see this?  If you read the rest of the context (vv. 13-18 specifically) you will see that Paul viewed his negative circumstances not as an obstacle to fulfilling his God-given mission, but rather as another opportunity that the Sovereign Lord has given to him for the advancement of the Gospel.

How do you view your circumstances?  Do you see only or mostly obstacles?

May we pray that the Lord would help us to see the opportunities for Gospel-advancement in every situation (good or bad) that He brings our way.  And may we give thanks in everything, asking Him to bless us by working through us for the spread of the Good News unto the growth of His Kingdom and the glory of His Name!

header4-resized-image-960x198Here is an EXCELLENT website with extremely practical help in leading your family in the worship of our worthy Triune God everyday! Please check it out!

The Holy Spirit enlightened my mind last night through my wife.

Whenever my wife and I have a “big” or “serious” argument, which is quite rare for us, she tends to be more emotional and therefore aggressive.  She is hurt and/or feels an injustice has taken place, which leads to her anger.  Her anger leads to her emotionally charged words directed at me.  Her goal is to make me feel the pain or frustration that she feels (to a lesser degree, an equal degree, or a greater degree).  She is aggressive in her attempt to achieve this.

I, on the other hand, am more of a “thinker” than a “feeler”.  I tend to be more reserved and calm in my approach.  Often what happens, however, is that I let her angry words produce anger in me, and I respond accordingly.  I have always blamed her for this, since I am the one who is seeking to be calm and use less emotionally charged words (at least initially).

But, becasue of God’s gracious answer to my prayer for wisdom and insight, I learned something last night.  I learned that we have the same goal in an argument.  I am hurt or feel an injustice has occurred for which I am angry and I want her to feel the weight of her sin against me.  I want her to feel the pain that I feel for what she said, did, or didn’t do to me (to a lesser, equal, or greater degree).

Just because I don’t pursue that end aggressively (at least not at first), does not mean that I’m not pursuing it.  I tend to be passive-aggressive; that is, I seek the same thing she seeks (pain for the other person) in a calm, cool, and collected way.  She comes barging in the front door, whereas I come sneaking in the back door.  Both of us seeking to accomplish the same thing.

I have been ignorantly arrogant and self-deceived about this for a long time (Jeremiah 17:9-10).  I always try to get her to leave her emotions out of the argument, as if my passive-aggressive way of achieving a wicked end is better than her aggressive way.  The problem is not so much the mode of operation, but the intended goal of our operations.  It is sinful to seek to hurt another person, especially one’s own spouse (Ephesians 5:15-33; I Peter 3:1-7), no matter what the approach may be.

What makes this so evil for me is that not only do I seek the same sinful end as she, namely, to make the other person feel the same pain we feel, and not only do I often revert to the aggressive method of achieving this end (using harsh words and childish gestures and mean faces), but I also seek to make her feel worse about being the main and/or first aggressive one and myself feel better about being the passive-aggressive one.

For these sins (of purposefully seeking to hurt my bride (whom I love and have promised to protect) with my mean and mean-spirited words, of dishonoring my wife and more than that, the God who gave her to me, and of my self-deceiving arrogance), I repent with a heavy and sad heart, humbled in my shame and guilt.  I fall at the feet of Jesus, my (the only) Savior, yet once again, calling out to Him in faith for mercy to cleanse me, save me, forgive me, and change me for His glory.

Next Page »